On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > [...] > If you can repatch this against HEAD, and check with metze (Stefan > (metze) Metzmacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) on how this might conflict with > his work in this area. In particular, it might work out best that metze > picks this up into his patch. (He is working on being able to modify > the quota from an Windows client!). > > Either way, this certainly is a very nice idea!
Is this the time to bite the bullet or take the bull by the horns? (Substitute other metaphors to taste...) In the devel/TODO there is a suggested "coding project": Rewriting Samba's current filesystem quota support as a VFS module. There has also just been another thread from someone requesting some sort of directory-dependent result from "df"-like functionality. Is now the time to extract the handling of "df" (default), "quota", "dfree command" into a generalised VFS structure, reimplementing those mechanisms in such a framework? Or maybe this is already being addressed? We can probably assist with testing and coding Solaris/quota, although we can no longer help with Solaris/Veritas/quota, as we no longer have such a server. -- : David Lee I.T. Service : : Systems Programmer Computer Centre : : University of Durham : : http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/ South Road : : Durham : : Phone: +44 191 374 2882 U.K. :
