On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 12:36, Richard Sharpe wrote: > On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > If two SessionSetups are sent, each resulting in a separate [V]UID, then > > > does Windows apply correct restrictions to each or does it allow the greater > > > set of permissions? That is: > > > > The question doesn't really make sense for SMBwriteX. It is similar to > > the way write() works in posix - a open file handle can be used in any > > security context, it doesn't matter what euid you change to before > > calling write() > > Right. The security checking is done at open time. However, I imagine that > there are problems over NFS. There sure are for another FS I can name > where read/write permission checking is deferred until reading/writing > time.
It turns out that Win2003 RC2 does check these... Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
