On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 05:50:49PM -0500, Vinay Kudithipudi wrote: > Jay - I tried the test without any options (i.e. all default) and still get > the same results > > Javid - I am using copy > > Jeremy - All clients are Win2k or WinXP. > > I would very much like to blame the hardware for the problem, but since NFS > yields better performance I am thinking SAMBA may be the cause here.
I'm not saying it isn't. Are you using PC-NFS between the same clients and the Samba server to compare ? Win2K and WinXP clients should be using the large read/write calls, so larger TCP buffers should be better for them. Do you have any network traces to look at ? Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
