Hi I have noticed that win98 clients have better performance tha win2k with sp3 .I have a similar setu with a 800 GB volumes . I will try the same tests from a windows 98 and compare .Also I have a 4 nic teamed using Intel ANS softwate that improved performance . Thanks
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Vinay Kudithipudi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 2:24 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba - Performance Issues > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 12:57:17PM -0500, Vinay Kudithipudi wrote: > > Hello Guys, > > I am having some problems with configuring SAMBA with regards to > > performance. We are running SAMBA 2.2.3a on Dual PIII 1Ghz machines with > > 512MB of RAM. The server is running on a default server installation of Red > > Hat 7.2. We have a 500Gb RAID 5 drive using the Promise SX6000 Raid > > controller. > > Currently we are only getting a throughput of ~5MB/S for writes and > > ~13MB/S for reads. Comparing that to NFS which yealds ~15MB/S for reads and > > ~13MB/S for writes. This clearly rules out the Hardware bottleneck since XFS > > is able to perform better on the same hardware. Here is the smb.conf I am > > using currently > > What clients are you using ? This can make a big difference in how > you tune things. > > Jeremy. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
