So, is it correct to say that if we use ADS security, there is no possibility of having any unauthenticated shares at all ?
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Madhusudan Singh < [email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for clearing that up. I would not want the AD to get involved at all > for this share anyways. > > > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Mike Leone <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 10/22/2010 2:12 PM, Michael Wood wrote: >> >>> On 22 October 2010 19:36, Madhusudan Singh<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Ok. >>>> >>>> In my mind, guest access should be just that - no authentication. >>>> >>> >>> Well, I believe that it is. But that you need to enable the Guest >>> account in AD for it to be allowed. >>> >> >> AFAIK, the "Guest" account is disabled by default in AD (at least, the >> later versions, 2003 onwards, possibly earlier). >> >> -- >> Michael J. Leone, <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF >> Photo Gallery: <http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeleonephotos> >> >> "You have become an avatar of woe and ire, and all of your deeds will >> conduce to evil" >> "Fatal Revenant", Stephen R. Donaldson >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the >> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >> > > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
