On Friday, 29.06.2012 at 17:33 +0200, Harry Jede wrote: > According to "KB-973289" http://support.microsoft.com/kb/973289 the > owner should be "everyone". Everyone has SID S-1-1-0 > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q243330 . Do > you have a usermapping for "everyone"?
(Thanks for your reply, Harry) We don't, actually: I read those instructions and, since our NETLOGON share is not generally writeable and our Samba isn't configured to use ACLs, those permissions wouldn't apply when following the recipe as described in the link above. Nowhere I've read suggests that the ownership setting is *critical*: our NETLOGON share presents as read-only guest, in effect. Do you think the ownership is critical and that Windows is rejecting the use of 'Default User.v2' simply because it can't ascertain that it's "EVERYONE"-owned, despite the fact that it could read it if it tried?! (I admit I side-stepped this part of the process and hoped it wouldn't matter, since reconfiguring Samba to allow this type of change would be potentially disruptive!) Thanks, Dave. -- Dave Ewart [email protected] Computing Manager, Cancer Epidemiology Unit University of Oxford / Cancer Research UK N 51.7516, W 1.2152
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
