On 15/08/12 08:02, steve wrote:
On 15/08/12 06:51, Gémes Géza wrote:
2012-08-14 23:15 keltezéssel, steve írta:
On 12/08/12 17:45, Gémes Géza wrote:
2012-08-12 16:26 keltezéssel, steve írta:
On 12/08/12 15:28, Gémes Géza wrote:
2012-08-12 09:31 keltezéssel, steve írta:
On 08/11/2012 01:10 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 11:21 +0200, Helmut Hullen wrote:

What is wrong with Vbox? Is Xen any smaller or faster?
Both smaller and faster
(http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_1110_xenkvm&num=1),
and unlike vbox both kvm and xen provide a way to boot your virtual
machine at the boot of the host.

Hi
Thanks for the link. Unfortunately Vbox is the only VM which has 32bit support. The others need 64bit, which we don't have:(
I'll ask on the openSUSE list to see if there is any workaround.
Cheers,
Steve



Hello Steve, you seem to be working on the same thing as I am, using Samba4 as a domain controller. I initially tried your set up and found the problems that you have, this is where we seem to have forked off in different directions. You seem to be chasing using Winbind and NFS, whilst I went with Winbind and Pam_mount.

I am only using one server running samba4, with Pam-mount I can mount any users unixhomedir (wherever that may be) from the server onto the clients (like windows profiles) via the use of groups and can also mount the dropbox share which shows up in the users home directory.

If you are interested, I can supply you my notes to try it out yourself.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Reply via email to