On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 11:37, Sharp, Clint wrote: > Quotes are required around the two ldap:// URIs AFAIK. I've not used AS > 3, but on 8 I've always built from Source RPM as I've also added ACL > support (pretty easy with the Redhat kernels, and even though they say > it's not stable, I've yet to have any problems with it). I'd go grab > Samba 3.0.1 source RPMs from the Samba website and build from there, or > even upgrade to 3.0.1 from the Redhat RPMs on the Samba site, as those > are known to have proper LDAP support included. --- It's a bit vague (changelog's for various changes since 3.0.0) but apparently they've fixed 'more' ldap group mappings searches...undoubtedly good - does that mean that it would be safe to have Computers in their own ou or even with 3.0.1 would they still have to be in ou=People?
I haven't a clue where AS 3 fits in RH 8/9 scheme - me thinks more like 9. I have been reticent to add 'value' to the Red Hat offering but ended up compiling Netatalk and Webmin from source since they aren't supported. I am gonna have to think about this one... Thanks, Craig -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
