On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Craig White wrote: > On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 11:37, Sharp, Clint wrote: > > Quotes are required around the two ldap:// URIs AFAIK. I've not used AS > > 3, but on 8 I've always built from Source RPM as I've also added ACL > > support (pretty easy with the Redhat kernels, and even though they say > > it's not stable, I've yet to have any problems with it). I'd go grab > > Samba 3.0.1 source RPMs from the Samba website and build from there, or > > even upgrade to 3.0.1 from the Redhat RPMs on the Samba site, as those > > are known to have proper LDAP support included. > --- > It's a bit vague (changelog's for various changes since 3.0.0) but > apparently they've fixed 'more' ldap group mappings > searches...undoubtedly good - does that mean that it would be safe to > have Computers in their own ou or even with 3.0.1 would they still have > to be in ou=People?
No. The search facility has not been fixed in 3.0.1. You should still use the People container for Machine accounts with 3.0.1. - John T. > > I haven't a clue where AS 3 fits in RH 8/9 scheme - me thinks more like > 9. I have been reticent to add 'value' to the Red Hat offering but ended > up compiling Netatalk and Webmin from source since they aren't > supported. I am gonna have to think about this one... > > Thanks, > > Craig > > -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
