AFAIR, security = server is somewhat frowned upon as compared to security
= ads or domain. I'd check the docs, though, especially for that param.
I'm sure it will be more than obvious.
---- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - User Support Spec. III
|$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
\__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, David Reta wrote:
We are currently running a Windows 2003 Domain with Active Directory in Native
Mode. I will be implementing a new Unix File Server that I would like
accessabli via Windows. It has been some time since I've played with Samba and
I know there are new features incorporated that allow interaction with newer
windows domains. Before I get started should I be using security = server or
security = ads?
Thanks,
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
