smbmount => not made here, please go talk to the kernel boys
mount -t cifs often works better than mount -t smbfs. Give that a try and then go talk to the kernel boys if it's still broken.
I understand that smbfs supports some older SMB dialects that cifs doesn't, but why the need for two modules? Couldn't they be merged somehow?
Just saying this because the existence of two different ways of mounting smb shares, (apparently) very similar, is kind of confusing.
Just wanting some info.
Carlos Rodrigues
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
