As far as I know, Sun Cluster 3.1 can natively cluster (fail-over) Samba 3.x http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-1081
Of course this is only available for Solaris (sparc or X86). Another this can be done with Veritas Cluster Server (Solaris is for sure, but I think Linux is also supported) with Application agent, as described here http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/ClusterServer_UNIX/275710. pdf Is that what the question was? > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jeremy Allison > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 5:23 PM > To: Abhijith Das > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 4 Clustering > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 05:14:44PM -0600, Abhijith Das wrote: > > Hi List, > > From what I've read in many mailing lists, Samba 3 is not truly > > clusterable. > > > > From what I understand, people have been able to cluster Samba with > > varying levels of success. Transparent failover and > active-active file > > serving ( 2 or more smbs serving the same files (through a cluster > > filesystem like GFS) from multiple cluster nodes > simultaneously ) are > > two things that are not possible with the current Samba. Or > are there > > more issues as well? > > > > There were discussions however, that mentioned clustering > being scoped > > into Samba 4. Can somebody elaborate on clustering support > in Samba 4? > > Samba3 has been made cluster aware by SGI via the work of > James Peach (on the Samba Team). James has posted his changes > and we're in the process of evaluating them for future > integration. Volker is particularly active in this area at the moment. > > Jeremy. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
