> -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Garrigues > Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 2:06 PM > > > From: Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 09:56:25 -0800 > > > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:47:59AM -0600, James A. Dinkel wrote: > > > > > > I don't know why, but I just tried this, removind the SNDBUF AND > RCVBUF, > > > and the file share does seem snappier. I had never messed with these > > > options, I just found several places that said setting these to 8192 > > > gave a performance increase, so I had always used them. Not any more. > > > > The trouble with the Internet is that really old advice never dies :-). > > I just looked in my own config files and found: > > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE > > I removed SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF. > > Of course, I have no idea why any of these were defined in the first > place. > > Should any of the others be removed as well? > > Chris >
I googled for IPTOS_LOWDELAY and found some information on it. I determined I don't want it, but it has advantages and disadvantages from what I read. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
