I would have asked if you tested on NT4 or W2000, but another Samba
lists reader emailed me directly that EnableMultipleUsers is now
implemented on W2003. So I configured it on my W2003 PDC (I no longer
have any NT4 or W2000) and it works (see below). Both sessions
originate from the same Terminal Server, and they start individual smbd
daemons on the Samba server. So maybe you do not have the hotfix or
servicepack or something. Here is the url to the W2003 instructions:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/913835
I'll edit my paper to include W2003 and re-post it.
Eric Roseme
Hewlett-Packard
----------------------------------------
emonster->smbstatus
Samba version 3.0.22 based HP CIFS Server A.02.03
PID Username Group Machine
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1441 administ Domain U xx.xxx.208.126 (xx.xxx.208.126)
1369 eroseme Domain U xx.xxx.208.126 (xx.xxx.208.126)
Service pid machine Connected at
-------------------------------------------------------
eroseme 1369 xx.xxx.208.126 Tue Oct 9 08:59:34 2007
backup 1441 xx.xxx.208.126 Tue Oct 9 09:21:51 2007
Locked files:
Pid DenyMode Access R/W Oplock
SharePath Name
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1441 DENY_NONE 0x100001 RDONLY NONE /backup
. Tue Oct 9 09:22:04 2007
1441 DENY_NONE 0x100001 RDONLY NONE /backup
. Tue Oct 9 09:22:04 2007
1369 DENY_NONE 0x100001 RDONLY NONE
/home/eroseme . Tue Oct 9 08:59:48 2007
1369 DENY_NONE 0x100001 RDONLY NONE
/home/eroseme . Tue Oct 9 08:59:48 2007
Stas wrote:
Terminal server already configured with "EnableMultiUser=1" , but all
sessions from Terminal server appears under same PID :
file-srv:~ # net status sessions
PID Username Group Machine
-------------------------------------------------------------------
8742 DOMAIN\user1 DOMAIN\domain users 10.163.128.42 (10.163.128.42)
8742 DOMAIN\user2 DOMAIN\domain users 10.163.128.42 (10.163.128.42)
8742 DOMAIN\terminal$ DOMAIN\domain computers 10.163.128.42 (10.163.128.42)
So , if i kill PID 8742 all files opened by terminal server users will
be closed .
Thanks.
On 10/8/07, Eric Roseme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Depends upon your terminal server. NT4 and W2000 - yes. W2003 - no
(unless they added the EnableMultipleUsers parameter from W2000). I
wrote a kind of wordy paper about this:
http://www.docs.hp.com/en/5015/Samba-TerminalServer_104Final.pdf. This
paper version does not include the W2000 fix, which is the above
parameter and hotfix Q818528. I have not looked to see if Microsoft
ever fixed this on W2003. I can send you the whitepaper with the W2000
fix incorporated, if you want it (i never posted the updated version).
Eric Roseme
Hewlett-Packard
Stas wrote:
Hello all.
It is possible to force Samba 3 server to create "smbd" process for
each user that open file from Terminal Server ?
Sometimes I need close files , but can't do that by "kill <PID>" since
it should close all files that opened by terminal server users ..
It any flexible way to manage open files on Samba ?
Thanks .
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
