it win2000 SP4 .. i thought that this problem was solved in win2000 sp4 but now i see at MS web site that Q818528 should be applied on sp4 systems too. ok , i'll try . thanks.
On 10/9/07, Eric Roseme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would have asked if you tested on NT4 or W2000, but another Samba > lists reader emailed me directly that EnableMultipleUsers is now > implemented on W2003. So I configured it on my W2003 PDC (I no longer > have any NT4 or W2000) and it works (see below). Both sessions > originate from the same Terminal Server, and they start individual smbd > daemons on the Samba server. So maybe you do not have the hotfix or > servicepack or something. Here is the url to the W2003 instructions: > > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/913835 > > I'll edit my paper to include W2003 and re-post it. > > Eric Roseme > Hewlett-Packard > ---------------------------------------- > > emonster->smbstatus > > Samba version 3.0.22 based HP CIFS Server A.02.03 > PID Username Group Machine > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > 1441 administ Domain U xx.xxx.208.126 (xx.xxx.208.126) > 1369 eroseme Domain U xx.xxx.208.126 (xx.xxx.208.126) > > Service pid machine Connected at > ------------------------------------------------------- > eroseme 1369 xx.xxx.208.126 Tue Oct 9 08:59:34 2007 > backup 1441 xx.xxx.208.126 Tue Oct 9 09:21:51 2007 > > Locked files: > Pid DenyMode Access R/W Oplock > SharePath Name > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 1441 DENY_NONE 0x100001 RDONLY NONE /backup > . Tue Oct 9 09:22:04 2007 > 1441 DENY_NONE 0x100001 RDONLY NONE /backup > . Tue Oct 9 09:22:04 2007 > 1369 DENY_NONE 0x100001 RDONLY NONE > /home/eroseme . Tue Oct 9 08:59:48 2007 > 1369 DENY_NONE 0x100001 RDONLY NONE > /home/eroseme . Tue Oct 9 08:59:48 2007 > > Stas wrote: > > Terminal server already configured with "EnableMultiUser=1" , but all > > sessions from Terminal server appears under same PID : > > > > file-srv:~ # net status sessions > > PID Username Group Machine > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > 8742 DOMAIN\user1 DOMAIN\domain users 10.163.128.42 (10.163.128.42) > > 8742 DOMAIN\user2 DOMAIN\domain users 10.163.128.42 (10.163.128.42) > > 8742 DOMAIN\terminal$ DOMAIN\domain computers 10.163.128.42 > > (10.163.128.42) > > > > So , if i kill PID 8742 all files opened by terminal server users will > > be closed . > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > On 10/8/07, Eric Roseme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Depends upon your terminal server. NT4 and W2000 - yes. W2003 - no > >> (unless they added the EnableMultipleUsers parameter from W2000). I > >> wrote a kind of wordy paper about this: > >> http://www.docs.hp.com/en/5015/Samba-TerminalServer_104Final.pdf. This > >> paper version does not include the W2000 fix, which is the above > >> parameter and hotfix Q818528. I have not looked to see if Microsoft > >> ever fixed this on W2003. I can send you the whitepaper with the W2000 > >> fix incorporated, if you want it (i never posted the updated version). > >> > >> Eric Roseme > >> Hewlett-Packard > >> > >> Stas wrote: > >>> Hello all. > >>> It is possible to force Samba 3 server to create "smbd" process for > >>> each user that open file from Terminal Server ? > >>> Sometimes I need close files , but can't do that by "kill <PID>" since > >>> it should close all files that opened by terminal server users .. > >>> It any flexible way to manage open files on Samba ? > >>> > >>> Thanks . > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
