Hi Toni.
El Viernes, 4 de Abril de 2008, toni escribió: > hi john, > > El Fri, 04 Apr 2008 09:12:38 -0400 > > John Drescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha escrit: > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:39 AM, toni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > hi, > > > > > > i'm experiencing a strange behaviour when setting ACL from Windows > > > XP clients (server is BDC with LDAP) after migrating service from > > > SLES 9.3 to SLES 10.1: > > > > > > i can't set ACL to a folder to give access to individual users > > > without allowing the group of the creator. step by step, i tried to > > > remove group permissions (which worked fine) but, when i add > > > permissions to other users, group permissions become effective for > > > the group in the directory (but no in its subfolders) > > > > > > the correct behaviour is that i can allow access to several users > > > without access for the group, and this was working after the > > > migration. > > > > > > it could be a different ACL behaviour between SLES 9 (Samba > > > 3.0.20b-3.17-1297-SUSE) and SLES 10 (Samba > > > 3.0.28-0.2-1625-SUSE-CODE10)? > > > We had the same problems, finally we have downgrade our samba to 3.0.24 wich is SLES 10 + SP1 base version. I had tested with 3.0.25 and 3.0.28 and had problems, also with domain trust with an NT domain Greetings -- Un saludo. Carlos Lorenzo Matés. clmates AT mundo-r.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
