El Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:04:21 +0200 Carlos Lorenzo Matés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha escrit:
> Hi Toni. > > > El Viernes, 4 de Abril de 2008, toni escribió: > > hi john, > > > > El Fri, 04 Apr 2008 09:12:38 -0400 > > > > John Drescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha escrit: > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:39 AM, toni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > hi, > > > > > > > > i'm experiencing a strange behaviour when setting ACL from > > > > Windows XP clients (server is BDC with LDAP) after migrating > > > > service from SLES 9.3 to SLES 10.1: > > > > > > > > i can't set ACL to a folder to give access to individual users > > > > without allowing the group of the creator. step by step, i > > > > tried to remove group permissions (which worked fine) but, when > > > > i add permissions to other users, group permissions become > > > > effective for the group in the directory (but no in its > > > > subfolders) > > > > > > > > the correct behaviour is that i can allow access to several > > > > users without access for the group, and this was working after > > > > the migration. > > > > > > > > it could be a different ACL behaviour between SLES 9 (Samba > > > > 3.0.20b-3.17-1297-SUSE) and SLES 10 (Samba > > > > 3.0.28-0.2-1625-SUSE-CODE10)? > > > > > > > We had the same problems, finally we have downgrade our samba to > 3.0.24 wich is SLES 10 + SP1 base version. verified, it works with 3.0.24! (SLES 10 + SP1, with codename: Samba 3.0.24-2.36-1616-SUSE-CODE10) do you know if this issue were reported to samba, i cannot find any ACL related bug in samba's bugtracker. if not i will fill a bug report. thanks for all, toni > > I had tested with 3.0.25 and 3.0.28 and had problems, also with > domain trust with an NT domain > > > Greetings > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
