On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Volker Lendecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 07:29:49AM -0500, Shirish Pargaonkar wrote: >> Mounted a share and ran this command >> >> fsstress -d /mnt -l 0 -n 1000 -p 10 -r > > google points at quite a few sites when asking it for > "fsstress". What particular tool is that? > > And, this is definitely a cifsfs bug. > > Volker >
I downloaded ltp-full-20080131.tgz few months back and built it and using network/nfs/nfs_fsstress/fsstress. I just recreated the problem a while ago against XP server, this time there were single commands per tcp packet. So I think the problem is server at some point just does not respond to cifs client in time (for whatever reasons) for cifs client to decide to reconnect declaring server not responding. I suspect the same for samba server. In case of samba server, I had turned on log level to 3 to see whether any messages are logged by samba server as to why it is not responding to cifs client smb requests but found nothing significant in the log file that was generated. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
