On 6/5/08, Volker Lendecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 10:09:24AM -0500, Shirish Pargaonkar wrote: > > I downloaded ltp-full-20080131.tgz few months back and > > built it and using network/nfs/nfs_fsstress/fsstress. > > Ok, this might give Steve French something tasty for the > weekend :-) > > > I just recreated the problem a while ago against XP > > server, this time there were single commands per tcp > > packet. So I think the problem is server at some point > > just does not respond to cifs client in time (for whatever > > reasons) for cifs client to decide to reconnect declaring > > server not responding. > > The question is -- is theres still traffic going back and > forth, or is everything stalled? If there's still traffic, > it might be necessary to fix the timeout handling of the > individual smb inside cifsfs to look at whether the server > is alive vs an individual timeout. Much like what Windows > does with the SMBecho requests. > > > I suspect the same for samba server. In case of samba > > server, I had turned on log level to 3 to see whether any > > messages are logged by samba server as to why it is not > > responding to cifs client smb requests but found nothing > > significant in the log file that was generated. > > A sniff of this might still be very valuable, even if it is > huge. > > Volker > >
I can't attach a 301MB samba server log file. Is there a way I can upload the file at some location? As far as cifs, it tries to send some commands but does not get a reply for a long time and times out, so everything is stalled. Regards, Shirish -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
