Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, ashis.v.purbhoo,
Du (ashis.v.purbhoo) meintest am 17.07.08:
Currently in the process of upgrading Samba v2.0.10 to Samba v3.0.x,
while conducting some minimal testing, it turns-out that Samba v3.0.x
is performing slower than Samba v2.0.10.
Set-ups:
A. Samba v3.0.x -->
Same PC client is accessing the samba share running on Red Hat 4.5
(64bit, HP DL380) which in turn has an NFS mount coming from another
SAN attached Red Hat 4.5 (64bit, HP DL380).
B. Samba v2.0.x -->
Same PC client is accessing the samba share running on Red Hat 4.5
(32bit, Dell T7400) which in turn has an NFS mount coming from
another SAN attached Red Hat 4.5 (64bit, HP DL380).
Maybe a change to cifs instead of nfs helps - I have seen that in a
school in the neighnourhood.
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
Samba 2.* default was "strict locking = no", and 3.* is "strict locking
= yes". If you have "strict locking" set over an NFS mount, it will be
very slow.
Eric Roseme
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
