Dear all,

I'm a software engineer at bioinformatics startup and we’ve been using
Samtools Mpileup for our variant calling pipeline. We've been working to
distribute the variant calling computation by using the '-r' option to
`split` the genome into smaller regions, and run mpileup on each one
separately, in parallel. We are recently using Samtools 1.1 and notice
discrepancies in the results, between running `without splitting` and `with
splitting`. Although most variants are consistent, there are small
differences in the called variants and the quality scores. For example, in
an analysis of a single exome sample, mapped using BWA men, a SNP is found
in a run with splitting, but not found in a run without splitting.
Furthermore, this SNP is located far away from the split boundaries.


There is already a relevant question asked before, but with no answer thus
far: http://sourceforge.net/p/samtools/mailman/message/30802728/. We are
aware about the relevant FAQ at
https://github.com/samtools/samtools/wiki/FAQ, which attributes major
differences (between specifying a region VS without) in the samtools prior
to V0.1.17, to the BAQ calculation. However, as this thread
http://sourceforge.net/p/samtools/mailman/message/30802728/ also pointed
out, we're still seeing differences (although much fewer) with the more
recent versions of samtools.


Does anyone else face similar difficulty? We’d appreciate your help/
direction regarding the reason for this discrepancy and how we should
handle this.

Kind regards
-Kevin
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Samtools-help mailing list
Samtools-help@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/samtools-help

Reply via email to