Hi, On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 10:25:15PM +0100, Philippe Berini wrote: > found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9, product=0x220d) at /dev/usb/scanner0 > found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x220d [CanoScan]) at > libusb:001:003
Ok. > > If it isn't, the kernel scanner driver probably hasn't detected it > > correctly. If it has, try scanimage -L. if that doesn't work, edit > > plustek.conf and check that "device /dev/usbscanner" point to the > > correct device (printed by sane-find-scanner). > > However scanimage -L doesn't work. Sorry about the stupid question, but what > do you mean "check that "device /dev/usbscanner" point to the > correct device " ? Well, "device /dev/usbscanner" is the default entry in plustek.conf. > In plustek.conf, I have the following: > > [usb] 0x04a9 0x220d > /dev/usb/scanner0 Add a "device" before /dev/usb/scanner0. You won't need the vendor and prouct ids. Are you sure that you edit the correct plustek.conf file? That one looks like an older one. If you compiled sane-backends yourself, the file should be in /usr/local/etc/sane.d/. > and also: device /dev/usbscanner Use only one entry. [usb] device /dev/usb/scanner0 > Finally, do I have a problem with hotplug? Here are my logs: No idea. Looks like Mandrake-specific. But as sane-find-scanner works, the scanner is detected correctly. Bye, Henning
