Hi, On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 07:16:12PM +0000, Alexis wrote: > > You should see at least the following messages: > > kernel: usb.c: registered new driver usbscanner > > kernel: scanner.c: probe_scanner: User specified USB scanner -- > > Vendor:Product - 55f:21d (if you are lucky: kernel: usb.c: usbscanner > > driver claimed interface d74c2624) kernel: scanner.c: 0.4.9:USB Scanner > > Driver > > > > > > If the endpoint issue is the cause for not detecting it you'll get the > > following message in syslog: > > > > probe_scanner: Undetected endpoint -- consult Documentation/usb/scanner.txt > > > That is exactly what I have got,
So it won't work with the scanner driver. The question is: even if there was a change in the scanner driver, would it be possible to support this scanner at all? I mean, we could rewrite the driver to ignore the second bulk-in endpoint but probably this endpoint is needed for operation. The better and more flexible way is to uses libusb. I don't know however, if viceo supports using it. > I read scanners.txt and I find the Colorado usb 19200 is supposed to > be supported! Maybe they sold two differnt scanners with the same name? This has happened before. But that's really a question for the viceo maintainer, I can't answer this. > I didn't get anything like kernel: > usb.c: usbscanner driver claimed interface d74c2624 though, however I get one > that says usb.c unhandled interfaces on device. That's ok. The "claimed interface" message is only printed when the scanner is detected. Bye, Henning
