On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 18:47:26 +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: >It's not an IPv6 problem ;) The function is called check_v4_in_range() >for a reason :)
OK, I see ;-) >Well, could you change in_addr_t on line 611 to some unsigned 32bit >integer ? >That means : >-in_addr_t mask; >+u_int32_t mask; /* or similar, depending on what kind of integers > you've got on OS/2 */ Yes, this works. >I'll commit that to CVS in a moment. I see the entry in changelog, but line 611 still has in_addr_t Could you please commit again? Thanks Franz
