Hi, On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 05:28:34PM +0200, Gerhard Jaeger wrote: > On Wednesday 22 October 2003 17:06, Franz Bakan wrote: > [SNIPSNAP] > > >No, why do you think so? > > > > A). because otherwise I get errors in avision.c and mustek.c > > there this function is defined static void. > > I see, but this has to be fixed also by the maintainers. I wrote the directly > (Rene and Henning), but at least from Rene I got no response so far...
The mustek backend has now support for sanei_thread. At least on Linux, it does not work perfectly (cancelling leads to segfaults sometimes). Bye, Henning
