> From: Henning Meier-Geinitz <[email protected]> > Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 11:13:15 +0100 > > Strange. It doesn't test for libusb at all. Usually that means that > the SANE version is too old or sane-find-scanner doesn't have libusb > support. But as it's linked against libusb that would be even more > strange.
Is there a chance this is related to the problem recently caused in Redhat 8.0 and 9 where a change to glibc caused sane-backends to fail to find scanners, because glibc had changed the search order for libraries, and sane-backends had a symlink to a v4l library along the new path and that prevented the usb-aware version of libsane from doing its job? Robert Riches [email protected]
