Hi, On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 02:22:16PM -0800, Robert M. Riches Jr. wrote: > Is there a chance this is related to the problem recently > caused in Redhat 8.0 and 9 where a change to glibc caused > sane-backends to fail to find scanners, because glibc > had changed the search order for libraries, and sane-backends > had a symlink to a v4l library along the new path and that > prevented the usb-aware version of libsane from doing its > job?
This may happen for the backends but not for sane-find-scanner as the latter doesn't use libsane at all. Bye, Henning
