Hi, On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:24:36PM +0930, Paul Smedley wrote: > OS/2 doesn't have libusb, but has a library usbcalls that provides > similar functionality, albeit most of the calls use different syntax. > > I have sane-find-scanner working now for most scanners, and have started > work on remaining functions in sanei_usb.c > > One query I have though is about devname > > I see in sanei_usb.h that the libusb format for this is libusb:busno:devno > > Is this defined for all devices or just ones that sanei_usb_init thinks > are scanners?
busno:devno is the way libusb defines USB devices. These may be numbers or paths depending on the operating system. > I assume that the format of devname really isn't important - so long as > it's useful to the usb method being used (ie kernel, libusb or usbcalls > for OS/2) in determining which usb device is being attached to? You are right. > In which case, I could use usbcalls:deviceno or even just deviceno? Please use usbcalls:something. This way it's easy to detect which access method is used. Bye, Henning
