Dnia ?roda, 8 listopada 2006 00:38, Olaf Meeuwissen napisa?: > > > > I've got Perfection 2580 Photo. The thing that doesn't work now is > > automatic film transporter. > > I'd be glad to help you in testing new backend. > > Sorry but that will not work. The Perfection 2580 PHOTO and FilmScan > 200 use different protocols. > > The reason that the epkowa backend can support this model
Olaf, saying 'this' You mean FilmScan 200 or Perfection 2580 Photo? > is because it allows the use of the non-free binary-only plugin that > converts between the protocols. AFAIK Perfection 2580 Photo works with epkowa and snapscan backends. But neither of them supports transparency unit. -- Jaroslaw Gorny -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20061108/c9c7dc05/attachment.pgp From [email protected] Wed Nov 8 23:23:24 2006 From: [email protected] (Jon Chambers) Date: Thu Nov 9 00:19:10 2006 Subject: [sane-devel] Help with deciding which frontend to use please In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> References: <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Hi, At the risk of muddying the waters still further you have another couple of options: 1. Kooka is a KDE SANE app that some people like a lot. 2. Additionally there is an xsane GIMP plugin. If you intend to process your images straight after scanning then the latter might be the way to go. cheers, Jon On Wednesday 08 November 2006 10:23, [email protected] wrote: > I now seem to have my Epson V700 working correctly on my Slackware > system so I'm left with the decision of which front-end to use as my > main user interface to the scanner. > > I'd prefer to standardise on one program simply because it's a fairly > complex area and the fewer different interfaces I have to learn the > better. > > So my choices are:- > vuescan - not using sane but it is well rcommended > xsane > xscanimage > iscan > > My main use (at least the one where I need to know the interface well) > is scanning quite a number of old slides, a mix of 35mm and 4.5 x 4.5. > Some of these are quite badly faded and have colour casts so tools to > deal with this are required. > > I've played with all the above programs a little and my reactions so > far are:- > > iscan and xscanimage seem not to have all the tools I need to > manipulate the faded slides. So, unless I'm missing something, I > think I can ignore these two. > > xsane seems to offer a lot of control but doesn't seem to be quite > as clever as vuescan at 'guessing' right to give you a reasonable > start. On the other hand vuescan has a rather unconventional > interface and I found it diffcult to apply the scanning tips from > the http://www.scantips.com/ site which were quite easy with > xsane. > > Also would I find it easier to use (say) the Gimp for the corrections > using the scanner front end purely for getting as much information as > possible from the slides? I'd prefer not to do this as it adds > another 'layer' of learning but if it's the right way to go then it's > the right way to go. > > So can anyone offer any comments (particularly any experience of this > type of work) on the best way of handling this? > > -- > Chris Green ([email protected]) -- ====================== Jon Chambers ===================== http://www.jon.demon.co.uk, 020 8575 7097, 07931 961669 =========================================================
