i am inclined to agree with stef for 3 reasons: 1. it involves the least amount of code change. 2. it keeps the soversion and major number in sync, which is more obvious to frontend authors. 3. i am not worried about bringing out sane3 quickly. if history be our guide, that is years away.
allan On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:42 PM, stef <stef.dev at free.fr> wrote: > Le Tuesday 28 October 2008 08:49:38 Ren? Kjellerup, vous avez ?crit : >> IIRC the version bumb to 1.0.19 was opted for >> Instead of the minor version bumb. > > Hello, > I have seen no such conclusion. > >> >> Kind Regards >> Ren? Kjellerup > > In order to have a clear picture of what developers want, I think it > is time > to anyone to express its choice. > Mine is to have the current CVS released as SANE 2.0 with the according > soname increase. > > Regards, > Stef > > > > > > > -- > sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel > Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" > to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org > -- "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"