m. allan noah wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:44 AM, Rene Rebe <rene at exactcode.de> wrote: >> No it isn't. >> On 08.04.2009, at 04:14, m. allan noah wrote: >> >>> judging by the shell, I'd say thats really an Avision machine, very >>> similar to fujitsu 4010CU. The avision backend is in need of a >>> maintainer... > > Ah- I am sorry, I made an assumption. > > CVS is not perfect, hence the pending switch to git. But, CVS is not > the cause of the backend problems. The cause is your insistence on > using an external scm, and dumping huge patches into sane, which no > one can debug. If you had used sane cvs all along, we would have had > small, working commits, and we could have tracked down the problem > sooner.
Why the heck GIT? Some 6 months ago I brought this up and most people seemed to like hg or svn. I know some weeks ago this git thing brought up, but, well, git is a pain to work with IMHO. Way to hacky and cryptic to use. Hg is way easier to get used to. > Brian- I am sorry your query opened such a can of worms, this sort of > thing is rather irregular. Perhaps Rene can answer your questions, now > that he is here. Well, the DM510 ID is in CVS, maybe even the last tarball release. -- Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name
