Hi Stef, On Jan 17, 2011, at 6:32 AM, stef wrote:
> Le Sunday 16 January 2011 21:00:41 Adrian Glaubitz, vous avez ?crit : >> On Jan 16, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >>> I have made several test scans and uploaded the results into a folder >>> at the university, please find them here [2]. I am also going to place >>> a reference scan at 300dpi, color with the Windows software since >>> scanning color images with SANE results in errorneous colors. >> >> I showed the resulting color image (color_300dpi.tif) to a friend of mine, >> and he quickly figured out that the colors are fixed by interchanging the >> blue and red channels and by shifting the red color layer 8 pixels >> downwards and the blue layer 8 pixels upwards. The shifting of the >> channels to be performed after swapping blue and red channels. >> >> The resulting image can be found here after swapping the channels >> and correcting their offset of "color_300dpi.tif": >> >> http://www.fys.uio.no/~adriang/scanjet-g2410/color-fixed.png > > G2410/HP2400 support isn't finished. The color issue you're seeing has > been fixed in latest source tree. Ah, ok. I was actually wondering whether I should be testing with a snapshot from git since usually such things are already fixed in source. Does the latest version also include a fix for the scrambled scans at resolutions other than 300 dpi? And a fix for the "Invalid argument" at 75, 150 and 1200 dpi? Nevertheless, I will give it a try with the latest version from git. Thanks for letting me know. Adrian
