The thing is, it IS listed in the supported devices list!  That's why I
bought it.

sane-find-scanner gives its chip as GL848+ though the list says it's a
GL124+. 
There is no source file gl848.c as there are for GL124, GL647 etc.

I have a feeling that Canon have a history of breaking compatibility while
keeping the
same USB product ID.

I have exactly the same result as previous posters.  Identical lsusb -v
except for the
additional line 'Couldn't open device, some information will be missing'. Is
that likely
to be a real problem?

Is there any mileage in faking the device to appear to be a LiDE 200 using
the GL847? 
That could give at least partial compatibility?  If so, suggestions
gratefully received on
anything to change apart from the array entry in genesys_usb_device_list.

Thanks in advance.  Who should I contact to get the supported deviced
updated, if the
problem is as it appears?






--
View this message in context: 
http://sane.10972.n7.nabble.com/Canon-LiDE-220-tp18977p20697.html
Sent from the SANE - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
             to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org

Reply via email to