Folks, maybe people on this list are open to reading about Ms. Romila Thapar's research and do not interpret it as justifying any type of destruction.
I see the book as bringing new analytical approaches in the examination of an event in India's history as well as discussing the interpretation of the event by earlier historians and existing political parties. That this is interpreted as a double standard and WWII analogies are brought into the discussion is a bit puzzling. Sapna --- "Khelan S. B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It seems that Ahmed's summary of Thapar's book > justifies the destruction of > Hindu temples by Mhd. Ghizni and the invading > Muslims since 'other Hindus > were doing it too.' I would like to echo a bit of > logic every 3rd grader > has heard at least once or twice, 'if ___ jumped off > a bridge would you do > it too?' > > What if, in the aftermath of WWII and the Holocaust, > the Nazi's argued that > they should be given leniency since 'Stalin killed > his own people too' or > 'some Catholics looked the other way while we were > gassing Jews' ??? How > DARE anyone even suggest such a thing? > > Why the silence now? Where are the voices of > objection on this board? > > Two words: Double Standard. > > -KSB > > _________________________________________________________________ > Check out the great features of the new MSN 9 > Dial-up, with the MSN Dial-up > Accelerator. > http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200361ave/direct/01/ > > ------------------------------------------------ > visit http://www.geocities.com/sapacchicago > email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > "unsubscribe sapac" in msg body to unsubscribe > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html ------------------------------------------------ visit http://www.geocities.com/sapacchicago email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe sapac" in msg body to unsubscribe
