Yeah...I'd like to be removed from the list as well...thank you.

Faiza Shirazi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>can someone please remove me from this list? i've
>tried myself but it has not worked.
>
>--- "Khelan S. B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>---------------------------------
>
>Dear All:
>
>I enjoyed that last article from HT. �It seems like we
>have developed quite an affinity for R. Thapar.
>Perhaps we could invite her to speak one evening for
>us in Chicago? �Of course I have a few comments to
>share:
>
>"Both Hindu and Muslim religious nationalisms emerged
>in the early 20th
>century and became a counterpart to anti-colonial
>nationalism. Where the
>latter was inclusive and tried to bring together the
>segments of Indian
>society, the former divided Indian society into a
>supposedly
>irreconcilable dichotomy - Hindu and Muslim, and the
>one excluded the other."
>
>First of all, in India's case there is no such thing
>as 'religious nationalism.' �We all recognize,
>understand, and support the fact that India came into
>existence as a secular democracy. �The nationalism was
>one of a Free India capable of following the course of
>her own destiny, not the one written by the Queen of
>England. �The freedom fighters of Hindu-origin
>(Gandhiji, Nehru, Patel, et al) never promoted the
>idea of a Hindu-only India. �On the other hand, Jinnah
>and the Muslim League espoused the idea of an Islamic
>State for Muslims only (how many Hindus live in
>Pakistan or Bangladesh versus the hundreds of millions
>of Muslims freely practicing their faith in India).
>Its only fair to note that Jinnah did not always feel
>that way. �Initially he was fully supportive of a
>single, free, secular India. �Why he changed his mind
>at the eleventh hour I'll leave you to ponder.
>
>"Sanskrit is projected not only as unique but
>ancestral to all Indo-European languages; thus Aryan
>culture went out from India. Other historians have
>argued that such theories are unsupported by the
>evidence from archaeology and linguistics..."
>
>There are many holes here. �However lets just touch
>upon a few blatant ones, shall we? �Is so-called Aryan
>culture analogous to Sanskrit? �What is Aryan culture
>anyways? �Terms such as Vedic, Aryan, Sanatan Dharma,
>Hindu, are just buzzwords for most today. �I agree
>that it seems highly unlikely (although not
>impossible) given the evidence today that Sanskrit
>came out of present-day India. �However, the India we
>see on the trusty Rand-McNally is not the India of
>yore. �Historically, the borders of a single "India"
>are blurred. �Her wings are said to have spanned from
>the Iranian mouintains well past present-day Mayanmar.
> Indeed the world's largest "Hindu" temple (I say
>Hindu for lack of a more precise term) is Ankor Wat,
>in Cambodia. �Can we say Aryans lived in the Khmer in
>the 12th Century? �Did they speak Sanskrit? �R. Thapar
>claims that the forces of Hindutva (yet another term
>that needs a good definition) !are twisting history
>for their own evil ends. �Sadly, some individuals are
>indeed bending history for political gain. �In fact
>this is not a new phenomenon (refrence the early
>Church, Communist Russia and China, Southern Baptists,
>and many, many others). �However when the history is
>not yet clear, and the research is still ongoing, how
>can anyone claim the one, true history? �What the
>reformers are doing in India is not a rewriting of
>history, but a reinterpretation along traditional
>lines. �This textbook revision is a welcome change,
>because it gives students in India a fresh perspective
>on stagnant topics.
>
>Please do not mistake pride and resurgence as
>exclusion and hate.
>
>Lastly, I'd like to comment on the overall tone of
>these SAPAC emails. �According to the SAPAC website:
>http://www.sapacchicago.org/ the Organization's
>mission statement is as follows:
>
>SAPAC Mission Statement
>
>As South Asians of the Diaspora we condemn the way in
>which racism, sexism, classism, homophobia, and other
>forms of oppression manifest themselves in the United
>States and abroad. At this time we are specifically
>concerned about:
>
>1) U.S. military interventions abroad
>
>2) The government exploitation and condonement of
>communal violence and violence against women in South
>Asia
>
>3) Economic colonialism and its role in increasing
>economic inequalities, labor and human rights
>violations, environmental degradation, and the
>systematic disempowerment of women globally
>
>4) The obstruction of civil liberties through racial
>profiling, illegal detainment, denial of due process,
>and surveillance of dissenting groups in the U.S.,
>escalating in the current political atmosphere
>
>Our goal is to use open artistic expression, public
>education, media outreach, community dialogues and
>other tools to create a forum for the discussion of
>these and other issues both within the South Asian
>community and between ourselves and others.
>
>It seems that a disproportionate amount of energy goes
>into #2. �What about the other Missions? �As
>Asian-Americans, which of these are more relevant,
>more pertinent to us? �Its important to hear more than
>just what S. Azmi's PR schedule is for the next week,
>what M. Sarabai had for breakfast, or what F.U.D. R.
>Thapar is spewing again. �How about discussions on the
>foreign policy of Kerry or Edwards? �These two
>individuals may have a far greater impact on our lives
>than Romila ever will.
>
>-Khelan Bhatt
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
> Say �good-bye� to spam, viruses and pop-ups with MSN
>Premium -- free trial offer!
>------------------------------------------------visit
>http://www.geocities.com/sapacchicagoemail
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] with"unsubscribe sapac"
>in msg body to unsubscribe
>
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail.
>http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
>------------------------------------------------
>visit http://www.geocities.com/sapacchicago
>email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>"unsubscribe sapac" in msg body to unsubscribe
>
>
------------------------------------------------
visit http://www.geocities.com/sapacchicago
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe sapac" in msg body to unsubscribe

Reply via email to