Hi Daniel,
 
First of all, thanks for your attention. Yes, the archive has exactly 44.886.329 bytes. I tested it for file corruption, and al files are ok. And I did donwload it again, with the same result. It seem's that the archive is incomplete on the source, but then other users would have the same problem! Could not anyone from SAP DP confirm that the original .tgz archive is ok?
 
Victor
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 6:37 AM
Subject: RE: Problem installing on Windows 2000

hello victor,
does your tgz archive sapdb-server-win-32bit-i386-7_3_0_23.tgz have the full size of 44 886 329 bytes?
maybe you have to download it again... :-(
 
hth,
daniel
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Victor Kroeger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 10:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problem installing on Windows 2000

Please, can anyone answer me? Has any from you installed the 'sapdb-server-win-32bit-i386-7_3_0_23.tgz' binary on Windows 2000?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:04 AM
Subject: Problem installing on Windows 2000

Hi,
 
I tried to install SAP DB (from the binary) on a Windows 2000 Server box (Brazilian Portuguese), but the installation aborts with the following message:
 
STDERR: check unpacked archive: file "C:/Arquivos de programas/sapdb/depend/symbols/serv-clu.dbg" not found
STDERR: installation exited abnormally  at Mo, May 27, 2002 at 19:04:04
I searched for the file in the "SAPDBDEP.TGZ" package but there is no such file in them nor even a directory called "symbols".
 
Does anyone now what's wrong? This is my first try with SAP DB, so forgive me if this is very basic.
 
Thanks in advance
 
Victor Kroeger
 
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.365 / Virus Database: 202 - Release Date: 24/05/2002
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.368 / Virus Database: 204 - Release Date: 29/05/2002

Reply via email to