> >Well, I learned to appreciate it, but I do understand arguments for berlios.de. > > > > >How about http://savannah.nongnu.org/ > > Savannah offers less than BerliOS, and maybe the SF compile farm is useful for > multi-arch build testing. Looks like SF might be it for this one (if peoples > concerns are founded, we can always move later). > > >Did you try compiling SAP DB from source code? Try running diff on all of it, > just for fun... :-) > > Yeah it does take a while... > > >So I personally vote to use SAP DB CVS (...and hoping, and dreaming...) and > keep in OpenSAPDB CVS only changed files, > >and make patches from that, and release them. > > Having thought about it, and read todays Statement of Direction post, that sounds > like a better idea. This way, there's no confusion about what our project is > about, and it should keep it more managable from our side. I can't imagine it > will be too hard to integrate the two sources for building. > > Does that all work for the OSDL people? That should work just fine. I think the Statement was quite positive, and we should stick close to SAP.
cliffw > _______________________________________________ > sapdb.general mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://listserv.sap.com/mailman/listinfo/sapdb.general > _______________________________________________ sapdb.general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://listserv.sap.com/mailman/listinfo/sapdb.general
