This is the content of the dbm.knl:
3EE6FC530002| |HISTLOST | |
|2003-06-11 11:54:27| | | | |
| | |
0| |
3EE6FCDD0004|DAT_00001|SAVE WARM|2003-06-11 11:56:45|2003-06-11
11:56:45|2003-06-11 11:56:46|2003-06-11 11:56:47| 1004| |NO
|Komplett_aaa
| 224| 1|
0| |
3EE6FE230006|LOG_00001|SAVE WARM|2003-06-11 11:54:38|2003-06-11
11:54:53|2003-06-11 12:02:11|2003-06-11 12:02:12| 0| 885| |autolog
| 272| 1|
0| |
3EE6FF160007|LOG_00002|SAVE WARM|2003-06-11 11:54:53|2003-06-11
12:06:06|2003-06-11 12:06:14|2003-06-11 12:06:15| 886| 8586| |autolog
| 272| 1|
0| |
3EE7009C0008|PAG_00002|SAVE WARM|2003-06-11 12:12:44|2003-06-11
12:12:44|2003-06-11 12:12:44|2003-06-11 12:12:44| 10229| |NO |inc_01
| 64| 1|
0| |
And here is the output of the dbmcli command:
dbmcli on newbr>backup_history_list -r LAST
OK
END
3EE6FCDD0004|DAT_00001|SAVE WARM|2003-06-11 11:56:45|2003-06-11
11:56:45|2003-06-11 11:56:46|2003-06-11 11:56:47| 1004| |NO |K
omplett_aaa | 224|
1| 0| |
3EE6FF160007|LOG_00002|SAVE WARM|2003-06-11 11:54:53|2003-06-11
12:06:06|2003-06-11 12:06:14|2003-06-11 12:06:15| 886| 8586| |a
utolog | 272|
1| 0| |
3EE7009C0008|PAG_00002|SAVE WARM|2003-06-11 12:12:44|2003-06-11
12:12:44|2003-06-11 12:12:44|2003-06-11 12:12:44| 10229| |NO |i
nc_01 | 64|
1| 0| |
As you can see the incremental backup was finished after the second autolog
was written. So it seams that the incremental backup doens't include the data
stored in the second autolog. Thats a bit strange.
Chris
--
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++
Bitte l�cheln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!
_______________________________________________
sapdb.general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listserv.sap.com/mailman/listinfo/sapdb.general
