Yes, I agree with you. I will send this to the developer.

Thank you
Uwe

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 11. Juni 2003 14:00
> To: Hahn, Uwe; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Backup & Recovery again
> 
> 
> This is the content of the dbm.knl:
> 
> 
> 3EE6FC530002|         |HISTLOST |                   |         
>          
> |2003-06-11 11:54:27|                   |          |          
> |   |              
>                                                  |          | 
>          |    
>     0|                                        | 
> 3EE6FCDD0004|DAT_00001|SAVE WARM|2003-06-11 11:56:45|2003-06-11
> 11:56:45|2003-06-11 11:56:46|2003-06-11 11:56:47|      1004|  
>         |NO |Komplett_aaa  
>                                                  |       224| 
>         1|    
>     0|                                        |
> 3EE6FE230006|LOG_00001|SAVE WARM|2003-06-11 11:54:38|2003-06-11
> 11:54:53|2003-06-11 12:02:11|2003-06-11 12:02:12|         0|  
>      885|   |autolog       
>                                                  |       272| 
>         1|    
>     0|                                        |
> 3EE6FF160007|LOG_00002|SAVE WARM|2003-06-11 11:54:53|2003-06-11
> 12:06:06|2003-06-11 12:06:14|2003-06-11 12:06:15|       886|  
>     8586|   |autolog       
>                                                  |       272| 
>         1|    
>     0|                                        |
> 3EE7009C0008|PAG_00002|SAVE WARM|2003-06-11 12:12:44|2003-06-11
> 12:12:44|2003-06-11 12:12:44|2003-06-11 12:12:44|     10229|  
>         |NO |inc_01        
>                                                  |        64| 
>         1|    
>     0|                                        |
> 
> 
> And here is the output of the dbmcli command:
> 
> dbmcli on newbr>backup_history_list -r LAST  
> 
> 
> OK  
> END  
> 3EE6FCDD0004|DAT_00001|SAVE WARM|2003-06-11 11:56:45|2003-06-11
> 11:56:45|2003-06-11 11:56:46|2003-06-11 11:56:47|      1004|  
>         |NO |K  
> omplett_aaa                                                   
>  |       224| 
>        1|         0|                                        |  
> 3EE6FF160007|LOG_00002|SAVE WARM|2003-06-11 11:54:53|2003-06-11
> 12:06:06|2003-06-11 12:06:14|2003-06-11 12:06:15|       886|  
>     8586|   |a  
> utolog                                                        
>  |       272| 
>        1|         0|                                        |  
> 3EE7009C0008|PAG_00002|SAVE WARM|2003-06-11 12:12:44|2003-06-11
> 12:12:44|2003-06-11 12:12:44|2003-06-11 12:12:44|     10229|  
>         |NO |i  
> nc_01                                                         
>  |        64| 
>        1|         0|                                        |  
> 
> As you can see the incremental backup was finished after the 
> second autolog
> was written. So it seams that the incremental backup doens't 
> include the data
> stored in the second autolog. Thats a bit strange.
> 
> Chris
> 
> -- 
> +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more  http://www.gmx.net +++
> Bitte l�cheln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!
> 
_______________________________________________
sapdb.general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listserv.sap.com/mailman/listinfo/sapdb.general

Reply via email to