On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 20:41 +1030, stephen white wrote:
> On 07/03/2008, at 12:16 PM, Chris Foote wrote:
> > - Dynamic languages aren't popular.
> >
> > - The popular dynamic languages have an interpreter implementation  
> > that
> >    doesn't lend itself to hiding proprietary code from prying eyes.
> 
> 
> Or:
> 
> - Dynamic languages suck for scaling up to real projects, even though  
> they're great for small scale RAD exploring.

Don't they use Python (Pylons and a bunch of other stuff) for
reddit.com? 

Tim


_______________________________________________
sapug mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/sapug

Reply via email to