I got everything updated and merged. Looks good to go. I was looking in the utils.py to examine the issue and I definitely see there is a lot to juggle in there. Thanks for all your work!
- JM On Nov 21, 11:15 pm, "Bruce Kroeze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 4:20 PM, joshm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm running into another issue which may or may not be related to > > this, it seems the option groups are not obeying their sort order > > field. > > I have Size, and Color...sort order for Size is set to 1, Color to 2. > > > It also appears that if you change the display/sort order on an option > > category the ordering is no longer being maintained or used. > > > I bumped my color option to display higher than my size option and it > > didn't have any effect. > > I think I finally have all this worked out in rev 1719. It is actually > remarkably tricky to get right, at least without making far too many > database calls. > Make sure to update as spec'd in the backwards incompatible page and you > should have sorting of both option groups and options done properly, with > the "M::B" style keys working exactly the same no matter what ordering you > use. > > If you run into any problems, please try running the product tests and see > if they pass. If they do, and you still have problems, please add a test > which shows the failure, and submit it as a patch on a bug report ticket. > > -- > Bruce Kroezehttp://gosatchmo.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Satchmo users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
