This is a bit if a pain. The challenge is that we'll need to develop a
solution that's relatively easy to backport to older versions of satchmo.
Fortunately it shouldn't be too hard but it is extra work.

I've opened ticket #748 to track the progress.  I don't know a whole lot
about these different implementations so if anyone has experience with any
of these libraries feel free to chime in and make a recommendation.

-Chris

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Bruce Kroeze <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:33 PM, basslineshift 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>> Dear Authorize.Net Developer:
>>
>> During the week of March 16 - 20, 2009, Authorize.Net will be
>> deprecating all legacy support for the SSL 2.0 protocol. Changes have
>> recently been made to the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard
>> (PCI DSS) which have made the use of SSL 2.0 a PCI DSS violation.
>>
>> Due to this change, it is critical that you update any applications or
>> integrations that may be using the SSL 2.0 protocol to support the
>> more current SSL 3.0/TLS 1.0 protocols. Failure to upgrade your
>> applications or integrations may result in a lost ability to
>> successfully process transactions via the Authorize.Net Payment
>> Gateway.
>>
>
> Unfortunately, it looks like it will.  We'll have to use something like TLS
> Lite or M2Crypto to talk to Auth.net servers.  At least, that's what I think
> based on some googling about python's built-in urllib2.
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Satchmo users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to