On Mar 31, 4:56 pm, Chris Moffitt <[email protected]> wrote: > It does have several dependencies so it will propagate the perception that > Satchmo has too many dependencies. It's not necessarily a show stopper but > is an issue.
Good. > Also, the license is GPL so we can't include it directly in Satchmo either. > Having it as an add-on is ok though. That would be sufficient. > > I guess my recommendation would be too look at it in more detail and see if > it does meet your needs. The truth is, we might want to develop more of a > pluggable architecture that allows people to use trml2pdf or Pisa or > whatever other backend they may want to use. Since the pdf generation > capability is not embedded in all parts of Satchmo, it should be pretty easy > to make this a configurable option. That would be great and I'm looking forward to see it in Satchmo... Thank you for your response. Sincerely, Gour --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Satchmo users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
