I don't know for sure but if you are looking for something lighter -- I
believe lfs is supposed to be a bit smaller/less flexible, etc:
http://www.getlfs.com

again -- I don't know for sure

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:21 AM, bobhaugen <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> In this message
> http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users/msg/37816d041d43dfc9?hl=en
> Chris Moffitt writes:
> "I tend to recommend a 256MB VPS solution as the minimum to run
> Satchmo. A 50
> item store with 50 visitors a day should run just fine on a 256MB vps.
> Webfaction is a bit of a hybrid and I've heard mixed results on how
> well
> Satchmo runs on it. I will say that if you must go shared, then
> webfaction
> probably a good choice and their 200MB plan should be more than
> sufficient."
>
> I'm putting together a website for some friends who run a Community
> Supported Agriculture (CSA) operation in western Wisconsin, and was
> looking at Satchmo to see if it might be a good base.
>
> So far I like it, but that's >$30 per month (at least), whereas I have
> a Pinax app of roughly the same size running fine on an 80MB
> Webfaction account (<$10 per month).
>
> A CSA would have fewer than 50 products and fewer than 50 visitors.
> And they are not big money-makers, just getting by.
>
> So, any good ways to slim down Satchmo?  Or should I start rolling my
> own ecommerce app?  Or how about incorporating some lighter-weight
> components of Satchmo in a Pinax-style reusable app project?
>
> (Just looking for suggestions, I'll figure something out.)
>
> >
>


-- 
http://www.sudovi.com/
http://www.twitter.com/lifewithryan
http://www.thecommontongue.com
http://www.lifewithryan.com/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Satchmo users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to