On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 01:06:56AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote: > Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tapota : > > > Hello, > > > > My Savannah test install is now working with DEV_2004-12-28_Savannah > > and some additional scripts, which means the work on the branch is > > done. > > > > I think we will get it running at Savannah and then merge it to the > > trunk. Then we will continue to work on better integration and > > additional features, but this time using the latest CVS and not a > > separate version :) > > > > I would like to know if there is any special procedure for the merge, > > and if there is any problem to fix or suggestions before to do so. > > > > > I'd like to be warned before the merge and test it on a test install > before. Merge is a crucial thing, I'd prefer doing safe backups of the > CVS tree before and being sure the code wont break the trunk.
Ok. I tried to include a minimal set of changes in this branch, so it is unlikely merging will break anything. The branch is usable right now, so you can test it. I'm thinking of something: I added the code to manage GPG keys, and a 'no-gpg' option in sv_users; however, since it is time-consuming and not very useful atm, maybe it should be replaced by a 'with-gpg' option (a behavior like the webgroup options). > Also, have you created an item on the task tracker regarding this > branch? Yes: https://gna.org/task/?func=detailitem&item_id=1127 though what contains up-to-date information is the text file in docs/devel. > Finally, do you think changes are worth a release? I don't think so. The changeset is small, and should then be improved (especially in regards to Gna/Savannah hardcoded procedures in Cvs/Download.pm). Up to you :) -- Sylvain _______________________________________________ Savane-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/savane-dev
