>>
>> I think we have these three things in all the copyright notice we have
>> here. I do not even know what was the original template that led to
>> the current notation in Savane.
>>
>> One can also argue that this is USA-centric. Well, what we do here is
>> anyway USA-centric.
>
> I'd say Berne-centric, no?
>
>
> The same document says that copyright notices are not needed (I
>suppose, because copyright automatically granted).
Yes, and it says its since USA agreed Berne convention, unless I'm
mistaken.
>
>> There's no such thing as copyright in France anyway.
>
> Do you mean copyright notices?
>
> The CeCILL (so-called french-law-compatible free software license)
> recommands using copyright notices as well, but maybe they had
> international in mind for this particular matter.
The following article highlight differencies between "droit d'auteur"
and copyright
<http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droit_d'auteur#Droit_d.27auteur_vs._copyright>
Does the cecill use the terms "copyright".
--
Mathieu Roy
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| General Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org/ |
| Computing Homepage: http://alberich.coleumes.org/ |
| Not a native english speaker: |
| http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
