This mail is an automated notification from the bugs tracker of the project: Savane.
/**************************************************************************/ [bugs #347] Latest Modifications: Changes by: Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 'Date: sam 24.04.2004 à 14:41 (Europe/Paris) What | Removed | Added --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Planned Release | | 1.0.3 ------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ---------------------------- I guess it means saving msg-id in the database and passing it as extra header to mail(). Why not. Would it be best to add In-Reply-To in reference of the original bug or of the latest comment? /**************************************************************************/ [bugs #347] Full Item Snapshot: URL: <http://gna.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=347> Project: Savane Submitted by: 0 On: sam 24.04.2004 à 13:23 Category: Web Frontend Severity: 1 - Trivial Priority: C - Normal Resolution: None Assigned to: None Status: Open Release: Planned Release: 1.0.3 Summary: Threaded mailed bug reports Original Submission: It would be nice if followups to a bug report had their In-Reply-To header set to the Message-Id of the original bug, report, so that all related mails appear in the same thread. See also: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=8675 Commentaires : ------------------ ------------------------------------------------------- Date: sam 24.04.2004 à 14:41 By: yeupou I guess it means saving msg-id in the database and passing it as extra header to mail(). Why not. Would it be best to add In-Reply-To in reference of the original bug or of the latest comment? CC List ------- CC Address | Comment ------------------------------------+----------------------------- cedricduval+savannah --À-- free --POINT-- fr | original bug submitter For detailed info, follow this link: <http://gna.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=347> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/