David Sugar writes:
> I think Savannah, and what is now happening there, is the codebase for
> the future, not Sourceforge or whatever happens to the pre-fork
> codebase. Being able to setup a Savannah anywhere will be very useful.
> It is a mistake in my view to have "one" monster site. There are
> plenty of projects organized around a small community or a campus, and
> having a Savannah one can role out to manage them locally would be very
> nice.
>
> At most, what would be nice is a meta-aggregation site, such as thru a
> search/directory engine for "published" projects on Savannah-like sites.
> Not all projects need to be published widely; sometimes someone might
> create a small site and set of projects for personal work, for example.
> Another example might be a company or organization which has some
> custom projects and some public projects. Being able to move projects
> between such sites easily could be nice also.
I'd even say that it's mandatory to prevent centralization to
happen.
> I think being able to deploy Savannah in a distributed manner, and
> having a global directory/search engine site that can sit on top of it
> would meet everyone's needs very well. I also think much of the work
> that has gone into Savannah will eventually make this become reality.
Hopefully ;-)
I completly agree with your views.
Cheers,
--
Loic Dachary http://www.dachary.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
24 av Secretan http://www.senga.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
75019 Paris T: 33 1 42 45 09 16 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Public Key: http://www.dachary.org/loic/gpg.txt
