The big problem with a distributed architecture wuith regards to project maintenance is handling data backups. One of the big bonuses of centralization of source code is easy backup. If everything is distrubted, you have to worry about your local group doing proper backups. So, if you went a distrubted route, it would probably be a good idea to make it so that data automatically migrates between servers to a series of master servers that have the diskspace and the backup equipment to back it all up, or provide as part of the installation describe how to do all of the backups.
Matthew M. Copeland On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Bill Lance wrote: > > --- Loic Dachary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > David Sugar writes: > > > can sit on top of it > > > would meet everyone's needs very well. I also > > think much of the work > > > that has gone into Savannah will eventually make > > this become reality. > > > > What state is Savannah in now? Could it be > distributed in its current architechure? > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals > http://personals.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > Developers mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://subscribe.dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers >
