On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 05:30:35PM -0600, Karl Berry wrote: > In addition to what the others wrote ... well, it is simply a > fundamental distinction. GNU packages have been accepted as part of > GNU, and as you know there is a nontrivial process for that. Non-GNU > packages have not. I'm a bit baffled as to why you're asking.
Sorry, in retrospect perhaps I worded my question confusingly. What I really meant to ask is why is there is a distinction made like this: http://savannah.gnu.org/ http://savannah.nongnu.org/ I agree that it's an important distinction to make, but I was wondering if it would make more sense to have everything under savannah.gnu.org and differentiate using a different set of page templates or similar for GNU. Thanks, -- Noah Slater <http://bytesexual.org/>
